The disputed phases by Ilias Spatha

The disputed phases by Ilias Spatha
The disputed phases by Ilias Spatha
--

Ilias Spathas analyzes the disputed phases of the Athenian derby.

“The derby had a French referee, he tried to keep justice and I think he succeeded. We have a phase for each team.

The first one is for the Panathinaikos team, a fall inside the area (s.b. in the 27th minute), the team asked for a penalty violation. It is a gray matter, it is not clear. The contact of the AEK player would have been illegal if the Panathinaikos player tried to dribble him, but he crossed and it is not illegal and that is why he did not give a penalty

The case for AEK (s.b. in the 36th minute) who called for a penalty infringement, the AEK footballer dribbles the ball, tries to turn his body, does a pirouette, loses his balance before making contact with the player of Panathinaikos and the fall is not related to the Panathinaikos footballer and is not an offense“, he said in his comment.

Watch the video:

Follow sportdog.gr on Google News and be the first to know all the sports news


The article is in Greek

Tags: disputed phases Ilias Spatha

-

PREV ‘One of Valencia, Red Star, Partizan, Alba and Virtus will leave the EuroLeague because of Paris’
NEXT Maccabi Tel Aviv – Panathinaikos 85-83: Defeat after a “thriller” and 2-1 for the Israelis in the Euroleague playoffs