The criticism of the Panathinaikos players with AEK

--

Panathinaikos was defeated by AEK and Stefanos Alafakis comments on the performance of Fatih Terim’s players.


Panathinaikos and Stoiximan together for the next 3 years! learn more

Bartholomew Dragofsky


He is not responsible for any of her three goals AEK, while in the second he even had a good exit to make it difficult for his opponent. He made a big save in the first half, another in the second and generally fought as hard as he could!

RATING: 6


Average appearance for him Spanish back, which failed to distinguish itself. Defensively he had some good interventions but also lost some duels, while offensively his promotions gave absolutely nothing to the team.

GRADING: 4


Try o Croatian stopper, who had a difficult task and had to fight many battles. In the first goal maybe he could have reacted better, in the second he is not responsible. He was also given a penalty that was not awarded, which could have changed the image of the match.

RATING: 5

Samet Akaidin


Bad look for him Turk, who made… a gift of 2-0 with an amateur error outside the area. In fact, this phase affected him quite a bit, with the good face he showed recently not appearing in the most crucial match of the season.

RATING: 2




Quite mobile and from the players who tried to give things and offensively. He had a lot of runs, stole balls in defence, had good advances and even had a clean penalty, which was never awarded.

RATING: 7


He did not manage to stand out Brazilian, which moved in more… shallower waters than we are used to. His image is average, since offensively he did not give anything and defensively he suffered a lot from his opponents.

RATING: 5


Bad and o Slovenianwhose 1-0 came from his own mistake AEK in the derby. Few things offensively, quite a few mistakes, lost duels and a generally mediocre image from a player on whom the “greens”… bet a lot.

GRADING: 4

TASOS BAKASETAS


Out of the mood for a fight Greek attacking midfielder, who failed to create anything for his teammates. He lost almost every duel, had poor set-piece executions, never threatened the opposition goal and overall performed well below expectations.

GRADING: 3


He played for one half, without showing much and giving anything to the team. He helped more in the marking than in the attack, where he was… invisible.

RATING: 4

DIMITRIS LIMNIOS


One of the same for the other “green” winger, who played in the first half and gave nothing. Lazy in his movements and completely harmless for the opposing team, he was not even noticed by the players AEK.

RATING: 3


The “green” leader received TOO MUCH WOOD, who did not receive a foul even with a request. It was the best he had to show Panathinaikos aggressively, without, however, reaching the high standards we are used to. However, it was very difficult for him to do anything more, since he constantly had 2 and 3 players on him, who even played… well above the foul line!

RATING: 6

Changes


He entered the match in the second half but failed to show himself and create any good phase. Of course, he was never fed well by his teammates, as a result of which he remained completely harmless for the home team.

RATING: 4


He came off the bench for the second half but offered nothing. THE Panathinaikos he had big problems in the axis, he was prone to every counter-attack, while the experienced midfielder was not able to contribute even in the creation part.

RATING: 3


THE Serbian fullback he couldn’t be seen in particular from the time he entered the match, with the match of course having essentially been decided. Mediocre defensively, he didn’t give anything offensively with his crosses or set pieces.

RATING: 3


Another player who came on as a substitute and failed to stand out. “Afantos” during the time he fought, with Panathinaikos of course, to be bad competitively and not be able to create any phase.

RATING: 3


He played for a quarter when everything was decided and basically he can’t be judged.

GRADING: –

FATIH TERIM


In another derby, Panathinaikos came on…lazily and conceded a goal in the first quarter. This time, in fact, the team never managed to get a reaction, despite having complaints from the referee. His changes didn’t help, the “Trefoil» faced too many problems in every counterattack of the home team and o Turk certainly bears responsibility for the poor appearance.

RATING: 3


“All Green” got a Viber Channel! Click HERE, join the community and be the first to receive the “Triphyllum” news on your mobile from the website of all Panathinaikos.


Read more…

The article is in Greek

Tags: criticism Panathinaikos players AEK

-

NEXT Barcelona: The decisive Abrines, Satoranski’s shots and the “red and whites” who do not play their own basketball